
The ‘second coming’ of Coach Akwasi Appiah received lukewarm reactions
from Ghanaians. Coach Appiah was blamed for Ghana’s woes at the 2014
World Cup and I saw his return as an opportunity for redemption after
the treatment he endured.
I thought Ghanaians would, if not welcome him with open arms, at least
give him an opportunity to redeem himself. Little did I know that the
bashing was going to begin just after playing his very first game.
Coach Appiah had the start coaches dream of for their first games.
Ghana beat Ethiopia by 5 unanswered goals in front of a packed home
crowd and introduced three debutants who not only had perfect games but
one of them scored two goals.
Not to mention, the team’s skipper, Asamoah Gyan, scored a landmark 50th international goal.
Which coach wouldn’t want to achieve the above fate in his first game?
Moreover, most countries would have thunderously applauded such an
achievement by its national team not Ghanaians.
To my surprise, Ghanaians, looking for reasons to be displeased, threw
this accomplishment out of the window in favor of controversy about an
armband that was worn by the team’s captain, Asamoah Gyan.
Skipper Asamoah Gyan wore a personalized captain’s armband with his
photo when Ghana played Ethiopia. Andre Ayew, the deputy skipper, had
to retrieve the original captain’s armband from the team’s bench when
Asamoah Gyan was substituted.
This prompted all kinds of wild accusations of Gyan’s arrogance and
unfounded speculations about his actions among Ghanaian soccer
faithfuls.
The fever pitch level of this hysteria forced journalists to harp on the
matter with both Captain Asamoah Gyan and Coach Akawasi Appiah during
the post-game press conference.
The question of the day – why Captain Gyan did not give his armband to
his deputy – was asked by almost every journalist in the room.
The coach and his captain had a simple and understandable answer to the
question: Gyan’s armband was personalized with his photo and was not the
original captain’s armband, which was given to Ayew when he entered the
game.
While some media houses and Ghanaians descended on Captain Gyan for his
perceived arrogance, much of the heat was directed at Coach Akwasi
Appiah for being too ‘soft’ or ‘too gentle’ to properly control his
team. I’m not interested in upholding the general outcry of Akwasi
Appiah as weak nor am I interested in condemning it. I however want to
raise certain points and hopefully after reading, readers will be a
little circumspect when criticizing.
Are Africans – or let me be more specific by saying are Ghanaians – too
quick to criticize our own? I belong to a discussion group consisting of
very intellectual Ghanaians. Naturally, the issue of Gyan’s
personalized armband came up for discussion.
Almost all of the group members who chimed in subscribed to the
argument of the day and blamed what transpired on Akwasi Appiah, whom
they charged as ‘weak’. Some even took it further, speculating that the
Gyan-Appiah saga would have never happened anywhere else.
To my surprise, when it was brought to the group’s attention that
Italian Seria A side Atlanta star, Alejandro Gomez, personalizes his
armband in almost every game, some members shifted their concern from
Akwasi Appiah being too weak to whether Gyan asked for permission to use
the armband.
NOTE: I did not hear Ghanaians calling Avram Grant weak when he did not
sack Razak Brimah from Afcon 2017 tournament after his explicit rants
on fans.
Does a leader or coach have to chastise or discipline a subordinate in
public to prove his toughness? My little observations on good leaders
inform me that they do not wash their dirty laundry in public.
I have seen the likes Sir Alex Ferguson, Jose Mourinho, Arsene Wenger,
Carlo Ancelotti, Antonio Conte and many more coaches defend their
players at press conferences even after obvious misconduct by their
respective players.
Going back to point one, hardly do I hear any Ghanaian call the above
coaches weak because most people know that even though they might have
defended their players publicly those players in question will be dealt
with privately. Can we give Coach Akwasi Appiah the same benefit of the
doubt?
Does a lapse in Judgment equate to weakness? Was Coach Appiah aware that Captain Gyan was going to use a personalized armband?
Did Gyan seek permission from the coach before using his armband? These
were the common questions being asked by Ghanaians. Based on the
post-game press conference, it appears that the coach was aware.
On the matter of whether Gyan sought permission, let’s assume that he
did and was given the go ahead, shouldn’t that then be judged more as a
lapse in judgment on the coach’s part since it could have led to
reprimanding from FIFA? A lapse in judgement is not weakness; it is
simply a lapse in judgement.
Making the right diagnosis for a problem is the best way to solve it.
Acting on our impulses and immediately jumping to the wrong conclusions
will not do us any good.
Can we learn anything from the past? Ghana has had some very tough
native football administrators with very strict stances before and I’m
sorry to say that those publicly strict stances did not end well for our
mighty Black Stars.
A prime example was when Coach Cecil Jones Attuquayefio, may his soul
rest in peace – decided to use all local players to play a world cup
qualifier against Nigeria on March 11th, 2001, at the Accra Sports
Stadium.
The game ended goalless which was more of a moral victory for Ghana but
that result diminished our 2002 World Cup hopes. The late Ben Koufie,
may his soul rest in peace – had a similar tough stance which
unfortunately did not end well too.
Are the Black Stars ready for a Ghanaian coach? This is a topic I will
address in a later article, but, in brief, I will say that it will be
good for Ghana football and, more importantly, for our players to look
forward to future careers in leadership roles.
Unfortunately, Ghanaians (our players inclusive) are not psychologically and philosophically ready to embrace this.